Login
Login
Email address
Password
Reset your password
Create an account
Help
English
|
Français
|
Português
Non-Tariff Barriers
Reporting, Monitoring and Eliminating Mechanism
HOME
NON-TARRIF BARRIERS
What are Non-Tariff Barriers?
Non-Tariff Barrier categories
NON-TARIFF MEASURES
What are Non-Tariff measures?
List of Non-Tariff Measures
REGISTER A COMPLAINT
Report Online
Reporting using a mobile phone
COMPLAINTS STATISTICS
Policy related active complaints
Operational related active complaints
All active complaints
All resolved complaints
POLICY REGULATIONS
LINKS
CONTACT US
All active complaints
Showing items 41 to 51 of 51
Go
Clear all
Complaint number
NTB Type
Category 1. Government participation in trade & restrictive practices tolerated by governments
1.1. Export subsidies
1.2. Government monopoly in export/import
1.3. State subsidies, procurement, trading, state ownership
1.4. Preference given to domestic bidders/suppliers
1.5. Requirement for counter trade
1.6. Domestic assistance programmes for companies
1.7. Discriminatory or flawed government procurement policies
1.8. Import bans
1.9. Determination of eligibility of an exporting country by the importing country
1.10. Determination of eligibility of an exporting establishment (firm, company) by the importing country
1.11. Occupational safety and health regulation
1.12. Multiplicity and Controls of Foreign exchange market
1.13. "Buy national" policy
1.14. Lack of coordination between government institutions
1.15. Other
Category 2. Customs and administrative entry procedures
2.1. Government imposing antidumping duties
2.2. Arbitrary customs classification
2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin
2.4. Import licensing
2.5. Decreed customs surcharges
2.6. Additional taxes and other charges
2.7. International taxes and charges levied on imports and other tariff measures
2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures
2.9. Issues related to transit fees
2.10. Inadequate or unreasonable customs procedures and charges
2.11. Lack of control in Customs infrastructure
2.12. Lack of capacity of Customs officers
2.13. Issues related to Pre-Shipment Inspections
2.14. Other
Category 3. Technical barriers to trade (TBT)
Category 4. Sanitary & phyto-sanitary (SPS) measures
Category 5. Specific limitations
5.1. Quantitative restrictions
5.2. Exchange controls
5.3. Export taxes
5.4. Quotas
5.5. Import licensing requirements
5.6. Proportion restrictions of foreign to domestic goods (local content requirement)
5.7. Minimum import price limits
5.8. Embargoes
5.9. Non-automatic licensing
5.10. Prohibitions
5.11. Quantitative safeguard measures
5.12. Export restraint arrangements
5.13. Other quantity control measures
5.14. Restrictive licenses
5.15. Other
Category 6. Charges on imports
6.1. Prior import deposits and subsidies
6.2. Administrative fees
6.3. Special supplementary duties
6.4. Import credit discriminations
6.5. Variable levies
6.6. Border taxes
6.7. Other
Category 7. Other procedural problems
7.1. Arbitrariness
7.2. Discrimination
7.3. Corruption
7.4. Costly procedures
7.5. Lengthy procedures
7.6. Lack of information on procedures (or changes thereof)
7.7. Complex variety of documentation required
7.8. Consular and Immigration Issues
7.9. Inadequate trade related infrastructure
7.10. Other
Category 8. Transport, Clearing and Forwarding
8.1. Government Policy and regulations
8.2. Administrative (Border Operating Hours, delays at border posts, etc.)
8.3. Immigration requirements (Visa, travel permit)
8.4. Transport related corruption
8.5. Infrastructure (Air, Port, Rail, Road, Border Posts,)
8.6. Vehicle standards
8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees
8.8. Issues related to transit
Other
Policy or Regulatory NTB
Not a policy or regulatory NTB
Apply search
Clear search
Check all
Uncheck all
Date of incident
Location
ECOWAS
Benin
Burkina Faso
Côte d'Ivoire
Ghana
Nigeria
Senegal
Togo
ECOWAS
UEMOA
Apply search
Clear search
Reporting country or region
ECOWAS
Benin
Burkina Faso
Côte d'Ivoire
Ghana
Nigeria
Senegal
Togo
ECOWAS
UEMOA
Apply search
Clear search
Status
New
Complaint registered with REC
In process
Resolved
Non-actionable
Apply search
Clear search
Actions
NTB-000-098
2.6. Additional taxes and other charges
2018-03-07
Burkina Faso:
Burkina Faso
New
View
Complaint:
NTB-000-091
8.4. Transport related corruption
2018-03-01
Ghana: After Wa
Mali
In process
View
Complaint:
Two truck drivers were asked to GH 5.00 before they could continue their journey.
Progress:
Upon hearing this, GSA staff asked to speak to the police but they refused to cooperate.
After this, one of the drivers was released but the other maintained. This pushed GSA staff to contact the focal person at the MTTD headquarters to seek his intervention. The latter said he would call the in charge at Wa and get back to GSA staff.
NTB-000-068
7.10. Other
2018-01-31
Ghana: Ayinam
Burkina Faso
In process
View
Complaint:
The driver called to be taught the right procedure to follow because he was involved in a clash with another car.
Progress:
GSA staff supplied the driver with the ECOWAS Brown Card secretariat's number. He also called the secretariat to be sure of the right procedure to follow. This procedure he (GSA staff) did explained to the driver.
NTB-000-028
8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees
2018-01-05
Ghana: Tema Port
Ghana
New
View
Complaint:
Attempt to impose an illicit entry fre, desguised as a union membership fee
NTB-000-018
6.2. Administrative fees
2016-07-12
Ghana: Tema Port
Ghana
In process
View
Complaint:
The Greater Accra Regional Shipper Committee has kicked against proposed Terminal Handling Charges by Shipping Lines for imported and exported goods at the country’s ports.
The group say the cost of doing business is already high, and so adding more charges will further worsen the plight of the business community.
In a joint Press Release, the group said ‘’the payment of the handling charges as an isolated local charge to the shipping lines is completely alien to the practice of shipping in Ghana since terminal operators already charge shippers the THC for cargo handling services provided’’. The Shippers argued that the proposed charges will be detrimental as shippers are already grappling with multiplicity of taxes.
Progress:
Ghana Shippers Authority (GSA) has take a number of initiatives to address the additional charges being levied for imports and exports.
1. GSA has held a number of meetings with stakeholders, AGI,GNCC, GPHA, FAGE, GIFF, FFAG,GUTA.
2. GSA has also discussed the matter with Shipowners and Agents Association of Ghana (SOAAG).
3. On 26th July 2016 there was a stakeholder consultation at the Trade Fair center, and a communique was agreed to reject the THC being impose by shipping lines.
4. The communique was copied to the Ministry of Transport, Flagstaff House.
5. It is expected that, the communique will be published in the National dailies by Monday.
6. the Ministry of Transport is writing to all shipping lines to hold on with the THC
GSA is working with other stakeholders to ensure these charges are not introduced.
Progress: 10-08-2016
The Ministry of Transport of Ghana has issued a communique to suspend the Terminal Handling Charges (THC) with effective 10th August 2016 pending the outcome of investigations and advice from Ghana Maritime Authority.
NTB-000-006
7.3. Corruption
2014-11-19
Ghana: Tamale South
Ghana
In process
View
Complaint:
Multiple Police Checkpoints and harassment in the northern section of the Tema – Paga Corridor . Multiple complaints received from drivers especially from Techiman, Tamale and Babato. The police demand money from the drivers before releasing them though all their documentation are in order. This delays the drivers for very long hours.
Progress:
Police contacted via phone to deal with specific reported cases. Meeting formally requested with the IGP to work together on a strategic solution to the problem.
Progress :
20th March . Initial meeting held with Ghana Police Service . As other stakeholders have requested for meetings on the same issue, a multi stakeholder meeting will be planned shortly.
Progress :
28th March. A multi stakeholder meeting was held with the police service to review the problem of harassment at multiple police checkpoints along the corridor. Stakeholders included BA, National Facilitation Committee Secretariat, Ghana Ports and Harbors Authority, Trade Hub Network, Burkina Shippers Council, Ghana Shippers Authority. Police Service acknowledged the gravity of the problem and called for an action plan to resolve harassment issue.
Progress :
8th April 2015 . Meeting held to review the multi stakeholder action plan. Actions planned include Corridor Monitoring, Sensitization and Publicity (Stickers and Billboards to publicize Police Service Help lines), Press Release from Ghana Police Service to prohibit stopping of transit vehicles along the corridors, Police Service to issue Directive to enforce wearing of ID by all Police Officers on Duty, design of a compliance document to ensure all truck and cargo requirements are met on departure from Tema Port , caravan on the Kumasi-Paga section of the corridor, meeting with Regional Police Commanders, etc. A follow up meeting is planned within a month.
NTB-000-003
2.6. Additional taxes and other charges
Policy/Regulatory
2014-08-23
Ghana: Aflao
Burkina Faso
In process
View
Complaint:
A particular Burkina Transport Company (name withheld) which had been subjected to withholding tax in Ghana when it was moving goods on transit.
Progress:
On 23rd September 2014, the Ghana National Committee of Borderless Alliance met the Ministry for Finance and Economic Planning requesting that the Ghana Revenue Authority issue a statement clarifying the issue and specifying that this refers to all foreign transport companies contracted to transport cargoes from Ghana’s port to another country.
NTB-000-001
2.9. Issues related to transit fees
Policy/Regulatory
2014-07-23
Ghana: Aflao
Burkina Faso
In process
View
Complaint:
The US$200 transit fee is a disincentive to the transit export trade through the ports of Ghana, which mostly consist of low value raw or semi-finished agricultural products. These exports compete on the world market with similar products from others in the sub-region. This significantly affects export volumes. For example SOFITEX has discontinued the export of cotton through Ghana mainly because of the implementation of the US$ 200 transit fee. This measure is also encouraging malpractices in the system which deprives Ghana of the legitimate benefits. It is important to note also that Ghana is the only country within the West Africa sub-region where exports from landlocked countries are obliged to pay a transit fee.
Another adverse effect of this fee is the fact that it encourages traders to move cargo in large consignments in order to avoid multiple payments per consignment. This often leads to congestion at the borders and also at the warehouses where goods are being offloaded. Such large movements are also not too good for the sustainability of the roads.
Progress:
The Ghana National Committee of Borderless Alliance respectfully requested the Ministry for Finance and Economic Planning of Ghana in a meeting on 23rd September 2014 for the repeal of those sections of the law (i.e. the Customs Excise and Preventive Service (Management/Amendment) Act (614), 2002 and Section 48 Sub-section 2 of PNDC L 330 as amended by the Commissioner’s Order No. 6 of 2002), especially when no such fees are imposed at the seaports and airports for the transit import trade.
NTB-000-005
6.5. Variable levies
Policy/Regulatory
2014-03-19
Ghana: Point of Loading
Burkina Faso
In process
View
Complaint:
Section 20 (2) of the VAT Act, 1998 (Act 546) outlines the place of supply rules for services. One cardinal determinant of the tax status of a supply of service under the VAT Law is where the supply is made. That is, if established that the place of supply of a service is Ghana, then such a supply comes for consideration as taxable at the standard VAT rate under the VAT law. This directly implies that if the place of supply of service is not Ghana, no VAT should be levied.
Progress:
On 23rd September 2014, the Ghana National Committee of Borderless Alliance met the Ministry for Finance and Economic Planning of Ghana requesting that VAT should be pro-rated and charged on only the distance covered in the Ghanaian territory as is practiced in neighbouring countries. This is in direct adherence to the existing VAT law.
NTB-000-004
7.3. Corruption
2014-02-19
Benin: Kraké
Nigeria
New
View
Complaint:
I was furious yesterday at the activities of the Benin Police who stamp peoples passport. In fact I was returning to Lagos from Porto Novo yesterday, and on reaching the Benin Immigration cubicle (where they stamp passports), I saw an ugly scene. Nigerians returning like myself were shouting and cursing, but nobody was ready to listen.
What was the problem? The Benin officers insisted that every new passport attracts a stamping fee of =N=1,000.00 and old passports (like my own) attracts a fee of =N=500.00. Previously they charged =N=500.00 for new passports and =N=200.00 for old passports.
I gave them the old fee, and they promptly threw it back at me. Even when I explained that I am coming from a very legitimate trip (From Songhai Centre), the officer-in-charge (around 1:00pm) retorted that Songhai Centre do not control borders, and threw my passport back to me. After shouting and waiting for about 20 minutes, (and being that I was in a hurry to move ahead so I can meet an urgent appointment in Lagos), I had no option but to painfully give them the =N=500.00, which they pocketed, before stamping my passport.
This reporting this incident i want to seek clarifications from you as to what is proper and also a call for you to investigate and sanction Benin Police & Immigration officers. All you need to do is to visit Benin stamping office with passport, and they will tell you the fee. Also Nigerian Immigration officers charge =N=500.00 for new passports and =N=200.00 for old passports. Please investigate all these, and restore order at Seme-Krake border!
NTB-000-002
7.3. Corruption
2011-01-20
Ghana: Paga
Ghana
In process
View
Complaint:
The activities of these ‘goro boys’ were reported to the Parliamentary Select Committee on Trade and Transport some 3 years ago. Further to this, a memorandum was issued by the then Deputy Commissioner of Operations on March 24th 2011, to the Assistant Commissioner at Bolgatanga, directing that necessary steps be taken to stop these illegal activities at the Paga station and further directed that the transit truck drivers be made to present their documents directly to GRA Customs without using these intermediaries.
After a relative short improvement in terms of a reduction of these irregular activity , we can report that these “goro boys” are back at Paga and their activities have even extended to Hamle and Kulungungu border posts. This persistent problem adds extra and unnecessary costs to traders, rendering the Tema–Paga corridor uncompetitive for transit trade, and contributing to increasing costs of doing business along our transit corridors.
Progress:
On 23rd September 2014, the Ghana National Committee of Borderless Alliance met the Minister of Finance and Economic Planning and respectfully requested their outfit to take the necessary steps to address the menace as it adds unnecessary costs to doing business.
<< Previous
1
2
3
Next >>
Display:
10
20
50
100
250
/active_complaints/page:3/sort:date_of_incident/direction:desc/limit:#
Complaint
Close
https://www.tradebarrierswa.org/img/flag_icons